I posted this over on TDPRI's "The Stomp Box" forum but wanted to make sure I got the exceptionally well-qualified people here on FG to weigh in, too.
I have a bit of a dilemma that I'd like to ask the community for assistance in thinking-out or resolving.
Question: using a direct-to-mixer/PA device without on-board reverb, would you recommend using mixer reverb (from a small-format mixer with digital FX, for example) or would you use a dedicated reverb pedal placed after the "amp"?
As a proponent of direct recording and long-time user of my trusty SansAmp Tri-A.C. for recording, a challenge with these "simplified" devices (compared to a MFX unit from Line 6, or Digitech, or Zoom, etc.) is a lack of reverb. This is, of course, easily rectified when I'm recording. But it's a concern now that I'm gigging with this same preamp, and my tone as of late feels far, far too "dry".
I love reverb. A lot. Especially "room" or "small room" reverb. I'm not crazy about drowning in "cavernous", "parking garage" or swimming in the "surf". I simply love what a well-configured "room" 'verb can do to mitigate the inherent dryness of using a direct-to-PA/mixer device in a live situation.
Is there a direction I should go in to add 'verb to my signal path (as below)? I understand when I'm gigging each room has it's own reverb, but I'd like to make my great sounding SansAmp sound just that much more "live".
Signal chain, in order from guitar to PA:
JoeMeek Floor Q compressor
Boss BF-2 flanger
Fulltone OCD
SansAmp Tri-A.C.
MXR Carbon Copy
Boss DD-5
Seymour Duncan Shape Shifter (tremolo)
DI box du jour (basically to convert 1/4" to XLR)
PA or split between PA and my Mackie powered speaker